Chapter 12 Polymer Structure and Physical Properties
During the melting process ΔG = ΔHm – TmΔSm = 0
So Tm = ΔHm / ΔSm
Effect of chain flexibility and other steric factors
Chain flexibility.
The flexibility of chain molecules arises from rotation round the saturated chain bond. The potential energy barriers hindering this rotation range from 0.2 to 1.2 kJ/mol. It is not surprising therefore that the flexibility of polymer chains is an important factor in determining their melting points. Thus polytetrafluoroethylene (Tm=327 oC), which is much higher than polyethylene because of it low entropy of fusion, which is results from the high stiffness of the polymer chains. The high melting point of isotactic polypropylene ((Tm=165 oC) is attributed to low entropy of fusion arising from stiffening to the chain in the melt because of the higher energy barrier for rotation about C-C bonds than in polyethylene. In neither case can a high heat of fusion account for the high value of Tm, since for either case, its ΔHm is well below that of polyethylene.
The involvement of inflexible group like the p-phenylene group would marked raise the melting point of the polymer as shown in table 12-1
Table 12-1 Effect of a-phenylene group on the melting point of condensation polymers
|
Repeating Unit |
Tm ( oC) |
Repeating Unit |
Tm ( oC) |
|
-O(CH2)2OCO(CH2)6CO- |
45 |
-O(CH2)8OCO(CH2)8CO- |
75 |
|
-O(CH2)2OCO-Ph-CO- |
265 |
-O-Ph-OCO-Ph-CO- |
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-NH(CH2)6NHCO(CH2)6CO- |
235 |
-CH2CH2- |
135 |
|
-NH(CH2)6NHCO-Ph-CO- |
350 |
-CH2-Ph-CH2- |
380 |
Other chain stiffening groups are p,p’-diphenyl, 1,5-or 2,6-naphthyl, diketopiperazine, triazole, etc.
Side chain Substitution
In most cases, the substitution of nonpolar groups for hydrogens of a polymer chain leads to a reduction in Tm or possibly complete loss of crystallinity.
Table 12-2 Effect of side-chain structure on the crystalline melting point of Isotactic poly(a-olefins)
|
Side Chain |
Tm (oC) |
|
-CH3 |
165 |
|
-CH2CH3 |
125 |
|
-CH2CH2CH3 |
75 |
|
-CH2CH2CH2CH3 |
-55 |
|
-CH2CH(CH3)CH2CH3 |
196 |
|
-CH2C(CH3)2CH2CH3 |
350 |
B. The glass transition
With few exceptions, polymer structure affects the glass transition Tg and crystalline melting point Tm similarly. Tg (K) is approximately ½ to 2/3 of Tm (K).
Tg = Tg ∞ – k / Mn
Tg ∞ is the glass transition temperature at infinite molecular weight. k is about 2x105 for polystyrene and PMMA and 3.5x105 for atactic poly(α-methyl styrene).
Where a1 and a2 dependent on the polymer type. w1 and w2 are the weight fraction of monomers 1 and 2 in the copolymer, Tg1 and Tg2 refer to the homopolymers.
Homework:
2. Predict and explain the difference in crystalline melting point between the polymers with the repeat units –(CH2)6NHCO(CH2)4CONH- and –(CH2)6N(CH3)CO(CH2)4CON(CH3)-.